Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-08 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M40 has a score of 85, which is much better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 score. Galaxy M40's construction is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, even though it was released many years before. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M40 has an older 10 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a quite bigger screen, a better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a greater display pixels density. The Galaxy M40 has a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy M40 features a much more powerful CPU than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and also faster). The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a better camera than Galaxy M40, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with better video frame rates, a much bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.