Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is somewhat thinner and a little lighter than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, although it was released 3 years before. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 7 more CPU cores. OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much sharper display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater count of pixels in each display inch and a little higher 1440 x 3168 resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better camera than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much more mega pixels camera in the back, a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.