Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, with an 81.2 score against 73.5. Galaxy Note 3's design is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, even though it was released 11 years before. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a much better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution, a better pixels density and a bigger screen. The Galaxy Note 3 has a much greater processing power than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a greater number of faster cores.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality, a bigger aperture, better video frame rate and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.