Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a global score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 overall score. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy Note 5's body is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, although it was released many years before.
The Galaxy Note 5 has a way better performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a quite inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a larger screen.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage. OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a lot bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and videos, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.