Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's score of 73.5. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's design is somewhat thinner and lighter than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, although it was released 7 years before. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a much better looking screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a lot better processing power than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much better memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a way bigger sensor, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a camera with much more MP.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.