Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is way better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, having a score of 89 against 73.5. Galaxy Note10 is an older device than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but it is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a much faster processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a lot better looking display than Galaxy Note10, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168, a bit larger screen and a better screen pixels density. Galaxy Note10's memory capacity for applications and games is just as good as the OPPO Find X7 Ultra one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a superior camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking images and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.