Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, having an 86.2 score against 73.5. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note10 Lite has older 11 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version. Galaxy Note10 Lite is an notably older phone than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but it's just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a much powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more CPU cores. OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168px, a little bit bigger display and a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra captures better photos and videos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a better memory for applications and games than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.