Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 is just a bit better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, having a global score of 80.2 against 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 is an notably older phone than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but it's way lighter and thinner anyway. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a just a little lower number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3168px resolution.
Galaxy Note5 counts with a much more powerful processor than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more CPU cores. OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a much larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality, better video frame rate, a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.