Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 is a bit better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, having a general score of 79.5 against 73.5. Galaxy Note7's design is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Galaxy Note7 has a much greater hardware performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a very superior camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking images and video in low light environments, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a much better 50 MP resolution camera and higher video frame rates.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.