Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-08 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 has an overall score of 83, which is better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 general score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note8 has the newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14, so it counts with a couple nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy Note8's body is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, although it was released many years before.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3168px. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 features a much better performing processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more cores. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with better video frame rates, a way larger back camera sensor and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.