Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-08 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, getting a 93.6 score against 73.5. Even though Galaxy S10 5G is notably older than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 5G has older 11 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a just a little greater pixels density, a quite larger display and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3168px. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with an extremely better processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores.
Galaxy S10 5G features as much memory capacity for apps and games as the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, they have equal 256 GB internal storage. OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a superior camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a way larger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality pictures and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.