Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, getting a 98 score against 73.5. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an extremely older and just a little bit heavier phone than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but Samsung could make it just a little thinner anyway.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better hardware performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, and although they both have 12 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more processing cores. OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1440 x 3168 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater number of pixels in each inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior camera than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a much smaller back camera sensor giving a lot worse image quality, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better memory capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a battery lifetime that's just as good as OPPO Find X7 Ultra's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.