Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 2024-01-08 | -- |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | -- |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 Active is better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, with an 80.9 score against 73.5. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S6 Active has the older 5.0 version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14. Galaxy S6 Active is a a lot lighter and a little bit thinner cellphone than OPPO Find X7 Ultra.
The Galaxy S6 Active has a very superior CPU than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit, a 64 bits processor and a larger number of cores. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a way larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography, a lot more MP camera in the back and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 43% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.