Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is slightly better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, with a overall score of 75.8 against 73.5. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a noticeably older and just a little thicker phone than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but Samsung managed to build it somewhat lighter anyway. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much more powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with more processing cores.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much better display than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3168px, a way larger screen and much more display brightness. OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with better video frame rates and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has better battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.