Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 is much better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, with an 81.7 score against 73.5. Galaxy S8 is an notably older cellphone than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but it is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter anyway. Galaxy S8 has an extremely better processor than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 8 GB less RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much better looking display than Galaxy S8, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a bigger display. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with faster video frame rates, a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a very superior battery life than Galaxy S8, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.