Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 Active has a general score of 81.9, which is much better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 global score. Although the Galaxy S8 Active is older and a bit thicker than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's body is still just a little bit lighter. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much better screen than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution and a larger display.
Galaxy S8 Active has a lot better processing power than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with 7 more cpu cores. OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a greater camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting images and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera, a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and faster video frame rate.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.