Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 score. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy S9 is much older than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's design is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter. OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a lot better display than Galaxy S9, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher 1440 x 3168 resolution.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a very superior hardware performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.