Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 512 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra's global score of 73.5. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it must be told that it's also a lot older, a lot thicker and heavier. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a really larger screen and a slightly better 1440 x 3168 resolution. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores. OPPO Find X7 Ultra takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photos and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a way larger back camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs and videos and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a bit better battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.