Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra's score of 73.5. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version. Even though the Galaxy XCover Pro is extremely older and a little thicker than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's design is still a bit lighter.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution, a higher pixels quantity per screen inch and a bit bigger display. OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much faster CPU than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with 7 more CPU cores. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.