Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is much better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra's global score of 73.5. Although the Galaxy Z Flip is noticeably older than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's construction is extremely thinner and somewhat lighter. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 4 GB less RAM, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a little greater display pixels density, a quite bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video quality, a F1.8 aperture and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a lot better resolution camera and a lot bigger camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy Z Flip features as much storage to store more apps and games as the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, both have equal 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.