Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, having a general score of 92.3 against 73.5. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an extremely older cellphone than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but Samsung was able to make it extremely thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a better 1440 x 3168 resolution, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bigger screen. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G and OPPO Find X7 Ultra have extremely similar storage capacity to store more apps and games, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a way better hardware performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a lot better resolution camera.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.