Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is a lot better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 score. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is noticeably thinner than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but it is notably heavier and was released 3 years before. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an older 11 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3168px and more pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a way better processing power than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, and although they both have a 12 GB RAM, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and OPPO Find X7 Ultra both feature incredibly similar memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, they have equal internal storage. OPPO Find X7 Ultra takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same aperture and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a camera with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.