Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has an overall score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's global score of 73.5. The TCL 20 Pro 5G construction is just a bit thinner and lighter than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but TCL 20 Pro 5G has an older 11 version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a way better looking display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a higher 1440 x 3168px resolution, a quite bigger display and a better display density. The TCL 20 Pro 5G features a really superior hardware performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster).
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a slightly better camera than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same video definition and the same aperture, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has better video frame rates, a back facing camera with a better resolution and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a little better battery life than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.