Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-01-08 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.09 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus is just a bit better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, having a global score of 78.1 against 73.5. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version, giving lots of additional features. Despite of the fact that the Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus is extremely older than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's construction is thinner and a lot lighter.
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus counts with a really superior performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a lot better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has a greater display density, way more brightness, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a bigger display.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has much more storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra takes a lot better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has better video frame rate, a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs and a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has improved battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.