Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-08 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a general score of 82.7, which is better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 score. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is an noticeably older device than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but it is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has the older 10 version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a much sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168, a higher pixel quantity per inch of screen, a way brighter display and a quite bigger display. OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a much better performing processing unit than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra captures a little bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a much bigger camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and pictures and a higher resolution back-facing camera.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.