Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2018-07-27 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.25 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi A2 is a little bit better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, having a 78 score against 73.5. The Xiaomi Mi A2 construction is thinner and notably lighter than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, although it was released many years before. OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a higher display density, a little bit larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels.
Xiaomi Mi A2 features a much powerful processor than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and faster). OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi A2, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a 66% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.