Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, having a 77.5 score against 73.5. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is an a lot older cellphone than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but it's thinner and just a bit lighter anyway. OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a greater count of pixels per screen inch, a quite bigger display and a lot better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a way better hardware performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra captures greater videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a bigger aperture, a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution, a much larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with a little better battery duration than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because it has a 5300mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.