Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a score of 83.8, which is much better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 general score. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is an a lot older phone than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but it is thinner and lighter anyway. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with an incredibly better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a better quantity of pixels per screen inch, a bit bigger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s count with extremely similar storage to install games and applications, both of them have equal 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a lot better hardware performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with 7 more CPU cores.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a way better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra takes a lot better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size aperture, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos and faster video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.