Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-05-09 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a score of 80.6, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 general score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has an older 11 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a way older and just a little thicker cellphone than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but Xiaomi managed to make it just a little bit lighter anyway.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a lot better screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because it has a way brighter display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168, a higher screen density and a little bit bigger screen. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a very superior hardware performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite count with very similar cameras, because although the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures in low light situations, slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features just a bit longer battery performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.