Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, with an 87.9 score against 73.5. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro body is just a little thinner and a little lighter than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, even though it was released many years before. These phones have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a really superior performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168, a bit bigger display, a greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a way brighter screen.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures clearer videos and photos than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or videos in low-light situations and a tinier sensor offering a lower image quality, it also counts with a much higher video definition and a much more mega pixels camera.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with just a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 6 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.