Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, having an 82.4 score against 73.5. Despite of the fact that Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is notably older than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's construction is lighter and thinner. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has the older 11 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a very superior processing power than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with more CPU cores. OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a way better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has a little bigger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3168px, a better number of pixels per display inch and much more brightness.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's camera is just as good as the camera in OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light captures and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a back camera with way more MP.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a battery life that's just as good as the battery duration in OPPO Find X7 Ultra, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a 0% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.