Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a general score of 76.6, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra's general score of 73.5. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has the previous 10 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 construction is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, even though it was released many years before.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a very superior hardware performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with 7 more processing cores. OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a way better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a little larger display.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same size aperture, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a camera in the back with a better resolution, a much bigger camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures and a lot better video resolution.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a battery life that's just as good as the OPPO Find X7 Ultra one, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.