Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is slightly better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, with a general score of 79 against 73.5. Despite of the fact that Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is noticeably older than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's construction is a little lighter and just a little thinner. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 11 version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much better performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores. OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a quite bigger display, a better screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra captures slightly better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos, a more mega-pixels back facing camera and better video frame rate.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a battery duration that's very similar to OPPO Find X7 Ultra's battery duration, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.