Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-07-03 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.80 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| White | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2420mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than the OPPO Mirror 5s, having an 81.3 score against 54.3. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is a lot newer, a little lighter and a little thinner than the OPPO Mirror 5s. LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than OPPO Mirror 5s, because it has a larger display, a lot better pixel quantity per inch of screen and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Mirror 5s, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a much better hardware performance than OPPO Mirror 5s, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ shoots much better pictures and videos than OPPO Mirror 5s, because it has a much larger diafragm aperture, a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with a lot better 16 MP resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way better battery lifetime than OPPO Mirror 5s, because it has a 36 percent greater battery capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than the OPPO Mirror 5s, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.