Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2015-08-22 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.86 x 2.93 x 0.19 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gray | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53 (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is way better than OPPO R5s, with an 81.3 score against 59.3. The LG V35 ThinQ body is incredibly newer, but just a little heavier and thicker than OPPO R5s. The OPPO R5s has a little sharper screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a way lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a just a little lower pixels density and a quite smaller display.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a lot better processing power than OPPO R5s, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and faster). LG V35 ThinQ has much more storage to install applications and games than OPPO R5s, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery duration than OPPO R5s, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh. LG V35 ThinQ features a superior camera than OPPO R5s, because it has a camera with more mega pixels, a much better (4K) video definition and a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video.
LG V35 ThinQ is a little more expensive than OPPO R5s, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.