Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 5.1, 4.4 | -- |
| 2015-05-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.22 x 3.23 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than the OPPO R7 Plus, getting an 81.3 score against 60.8. LG V35 ThinQ's body is a lot newer, somewhat lighter and a little thinner than OPPO R7 Plus. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior processing power than OPPO R7 Plus, because it has more cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than OPPO R7 Plus, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a way higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a greater pixel number in each inch in the screen. LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than OPPO R7 Plus, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a back facing camera with more MP and a much bigger aperture to capture better low light images and video.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a much greater storage to install applications and games than OPPO R7 Plus, because it has more internal storage. The OPPO R7 Plus has improved battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than OPPO R7 Plus, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.