Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 5.1, 4.4 | -- |
| 2015-05-20 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.22 x 3.23 x 0.31 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Gold and Gray |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is way better than the OPPO R7 Plus, getting an 81.9 score against 60.8. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active design is a lot newer, but way thicker and a bit heavier than the OPPO R7 Plus. The Galaxy S8 Active features a better performing CPU than OPPO R7 Plus, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy S8 Active counts with just a bit better looking display than OPPO R7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and a lot higher pixel amount per inch of screen. Galaxy S8 Active counts with a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO R7 Plus, because it has 64 GB internal storage.
OPPO R7 Plus features a bit superior battery life than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 2% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy S8 Active features a little bit better camera than OPPO R7 Plus, because although it has a less MP camera and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a much bigger aperture.
The Galaxy S8 Active is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.