Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 4.4 | -- |
| 2015-05-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.63 x 2.80 x 0.25 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than the OPPO R7, having a score of 81.3 against 58.9. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ is newer than the OPPO R7, it is just a little heavier and somewhat thicker. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior processing unit than OPPO R7, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
OPPO R7 features a slightly better screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a bit lower display pixels density, a little smaller screen and a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO R7, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better camera than OPPO R7, because it has a back-facing camera with more megapixels, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot larger aperture to capture better low light photography. LG V35 ThinQ features a much better battery duration than OPPO R7, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 2320mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than OPPO R7, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.