Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.9 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Nokia |
| Android 4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-05-20 | 2019-06-10 |
| 5.63 x 2.80 x 0.25 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black |
| Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.13 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 A is slightly better than OPPO R7, having a global score of 64.8 against 58.9. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Nokia 3.1 A has a newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO R7 has Android 4.4, so it offers some nice extra features. The Nokia 3.1 A body is way newer than the OPPO R7's, but it is much thicker and just a little bit heavier.
Nokia 3.1 A has a little faster processor than OPPO R7, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores. The OPPO R7 features a much sharper screen than Nokia 3.1 A, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a way higher display pixels density.
OPPO R7 has a slightly better camera than Nokia 3.1 A, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking images or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the OPPO R7 also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 13 megapixels resolution.
The Nokia 3.1 A counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO R7, because it has 16 GB more internal storage capacity. Nokia 3.1 A has superior battery lifetime than OPPO R7, because it has 2990mAh of battery capacity against 2320mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Nokia 3.1 A is also by far the cheapest, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.