Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 4.4 | -- |
| 2015-05-20 | 2017-08-11 |
| 5.63 x 2.80 x 0.25 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Gold and Gray |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 Active has a general score of 81.9, which is much better than the OPPO R7's 58.9 overall score. The Galaxy S8 Active body is a lot newer than the OPPO R7's, although it's noticeably thicker and heavier. The Galaxy S8 Active and OPPO R7 feature similar screens, although the Galaxy S8 Active also has a better pixel quantity in each screen inch, a lot better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and a bigger screen.
The Galaxy S8 Active features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO R7, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a greater performance than OPPO R7, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and faster).
The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a little bit better camera than OPPO R7, because although it has a less mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much larger aperture to take better low light photography and video and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a much longer battery lifetime than OPPO R7, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.