Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-18 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.98 x 2.97 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1866 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is much better than the OPPO R7s's global score of 62.2. LG V35 ThinQ is a extremely newer phone than the OPPO R7s, but it's a bit heavier and a little thicker. The OPPO R7s and the LG V35 ThinQ feature really similar displays, although the LG V35 ThinQ also has a better screen pixels density, a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a little bit larger screen.
LG V35 ThinQ features a superior CPU than OPPO R7s, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and faster). The LG V35 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO R7s, because it has more internal storage capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots a bit better videos and photos than OPPO R7s, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a more mega pixels camera in the back and a lot larger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations.
LG V35 ThinQ features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than OPPO R7s, because it has a 7 percent bigger battery size.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more money than the OPPO R7s, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.