Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-18 | 2017-08-11 |
| 5.98 x 2.97 x 0.27 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gold | Gold and Gray |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1866 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 Active has a general score of 81.9, which is way better than OPPO R7s's 62.2 score. Galaxy S8 Active's design is newer than OPPO R7s's, but it is thicker and a lot heavier. Galaxy S8 Active features a little bit better display than OPPO R7s, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels, a little bit larger screen and a higher display density.
Galaxy S8 Active has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than OPPO R7s, because it has 64 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a better processor than OPPO R7s, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy S8 Active also has a larger number of cores (and also faster).
Galaxy S8 Active has improved battery duration than OPPO R7s, because it has a 30% larger battery size. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a slightly better camera than OPPO R7s, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a lower resolution camera, it also counts with a much bigger aperture to take better photos in low-light situations.
Galaxy S8 Active is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.