Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| 2019-06-12 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and Green | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 Plus is much better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, having an 87.1 score against 73.9. Apple iPhone 8 Plus's body is thinner and just a bit lighter than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a bit more powerful CPU than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has 5 GB less RAM and 2 less and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus features just a bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better screen density. The iPhone 8 Plus features as much memory for applications, games, photos and videos as OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity instead of 2691mAh. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom takes much clearer photographs and videos than iPhone 8 Plus, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a bigger aperture, a much larger sensor and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.