Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| 2019-06-12 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Green | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's general score of 73.9. Apple iPhone X's design is thinner and somewhat lighter than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, despite of the fact that it was released only 20 months before. The iPhone X has a little bit better performance than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has lesser and slower cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone X counts with a bit more vivid screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little bit higher number of pixels in each screen inch. Apple iPhone X and OPPO Reno 10x Zoom count with really similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, both have the same 256 GB internal memory.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom captures better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a back facing camera with a lot better resolution, a larger camera aperture and a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4065mAh battery size against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.