Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| 2019-06-12 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and Green | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, having an 84.2 score against 73.9. Although the iPhone XS and the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom were only released with a few months difference, the iPhone XS is lighter and thinner. The iPhone XS features just a bit better screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better display pixel density and a bit higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. IPhone XS counts with just a bit better performance than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a better camera than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a way larger sensor capturing way higher quality photographs and videos.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 4065mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.