Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| 2019-06-12 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is slightly better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 overall score. Google Pixel 3 is a way lighter and thinner phone than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, although both were released with only 8 months difference. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a little better performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better looking display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a way better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a larger camera aperture, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a lot bigger back camera sensor and a way better 48 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a much bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a much better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.