Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| 2019-06-12 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and Green | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is much better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's global score of 73.9. The Google Pixel 4 XL construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, even when both of them were only released with a couple months difference. Google Pixel 4 XL's CPU is very similar to the CPU in OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, and although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a bit better display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and a higher pixel density. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom takes greater photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.7 camera aperture, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4065mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.