Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black and Green | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is a lot better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, having a global score of 89 against 73.9. Google Pixel 5's design is newer, a lot lighter and thinner than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. The Google Pixel 5 features a little bit better screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a just a bit better display density.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features just a little better performance than Google Pixel 5. Both have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has more internal storage. The Google Pixel 5's battery performance is just as good as OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's battery life, although the Google Pixel 5 also has a 0% larger battery size.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom captures much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a back facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.