Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 390 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with a general score of 77.7 against 73.9. The HTC One M9 is an a lot older and a bit thicker device than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, but HTC managed to make it noticeably lighter anyway. HTC One M9 has a much better screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The HTC One M9 has just a bit better performance than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a GPU and a 64-bits CPU.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom takes much clearer photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a way bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos, a back camera with a way better resolution and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.