Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| 2019-06-12 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and Green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra has an overall score of 77, which is just a bit better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 global score. The HTC U Ultra is an incredibly older cellphone than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, but it is thinner and notably lighter anyway. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4 more cores and 4 GB more RAM memory.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a little bit better looking display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better screen pixels density. HTC U Ultra has a bigger storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a much better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom captures much better pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a bigger aperture, better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera and a bigger camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.